• Hello there guest and Welcome to The #1 Classic Mustang forum!
    To gain full access you must Register. Registration is free and it takes only a few moments to complete.
    Already a member? Login here then!

Dim taillights (this was almost a 'wrecked my Mustang' post...)

if your problem is a little bit of resistance causing voltage drop, then switching to a plug in led based bulb should help in itself. they draw over a magnitude less current.
 
Well, I pulled the taillight housings yesterday. Cleaned them up and painted the interior white. It helped a little but not enough.

Next, I'll clean the ground tabs, and the contact points in the bulb sockets per Mid's suggestion.

I also just ordered a taillight kit today... lenses, gaskets and bezels. I needed those anyway, and hopefully the new lenses will help.
 
"buckeyedemon" said:
if your problem is a little bit of resistance causing voltage drop, then switching to a plug in led based bulb should help in itself. they draw over a magnitude less current.

Speaking of those LED bulbs... I saw on your thread on 69Stang.com where you were talking about bulb selection and thought maybe the red 18 LED bulb would have worked out the best for you. Do you still feel that way now that you've had some time with the 45s?
 
Go LED for sure, I used the sequential Mustang Project kit and they are shockingly bright, 230 leds or something crazy. They were also super easy to install, plug and play. They literally light up signs I have passed from GREAT distances.
 
"DougG69" said:
Speaking of those LED bulbs... I saw on your thread on 69Stang.com where you were talking about bulb selection and thought maybe the red 18 LED bulb would have worked out the best for you. Do you still feel that way now that you've had some time with the 45s?

i don't recall where i said a red 18 LED bulb would have been the best (as compared to the red 45). I believe i said the red 18 would have been better than the white 18 that i had originally purchased. if you could point me to where i said a red 18 would have been the best (as compared to a red 45) then let me know. i'll need to fix that.

without having tested the red 18 LED bulb, i would speculate the intensity between the 18 and 45 isn't all that much difference. that's purely a guess though.

i've never compared the three different bulbs to a standard to see the light difference. i think i'll pick up a standard bulb tonight and do some test. i'll post pics tomorrow or at a minimum indicate the light difference.

with either the silverstars, white 18 LED, red 45 led, i personally felt the light output was fantastic. so i don't know what the problem with people feeling the tail lights are dim. I did paint the buckets white (i think gloss?), have new lenses and a new tail light harness, so maybe all those things add up to nice lighting.
 
I replaced my tail lights with the Mustang Project LED units some time ago. I had tried using the halogen bulbs previously, but they didn't produce enough of a difference between the bright tail lights and the slightly brighter brake lights to convince me that I wouldn't be hit from behind even with the brighter lights. The step function between the tail light and brake light illumination from the LED units is just what I wanted. Bright tail lights and brake lights you can't miss. The only thing to remember is to replace the emergency flasher with one of the Mustang Project units. I didn't and my e-flashers don't work anymore.
 
comparison of a standard 1157 bulb (drivers side) and a 45 Red LED plug in bulb (passenger side) with the running lights and brakes.

the pics don't quite show it but the LED is slightly brighter and has a deeper red color (i think it looks a little better).

i snapped the same type of pictures of my daily driver (escort if you can't tell...). same camera and settings, same time at night.

IMG_3125.jpg


IMG_3127.jpg


IMG_3124.jpg


IMG_3128.jpg


i honestly don't see a visibility problem with either bulb.


for pure reference info for this site, i copied the following from a post i had made on my build thread.

.......................................
also for reference, i snapped some pics of testing a few different bulbs for the tail lights (1157).

Sylvania Silver Star. rated at 645mA/2100mA per bulb.
they claim 40% brighter than a standard. i didn't test the standard bulb, so i don't know if it's that much better.

1157-W18-T rated at 35mA/210mA
these use 18 white leds. (i should have gotten a red)

1157-R45-T rated at 25mA/165mA
these use 45 red leds

IMG_2721.jpg


i tried to take some pics but it's hard to tell.

left: silverstar
right: red led
the red led is actually just a little more red than the silverstar. my camera doesn't indicate this though.
IMG_2730.jpg


brakes on
IMG_2731.jpg


left: white led
right: red led
IMG_2733.jpg


brakes on
IMG_2732.jpg


i really liked the color of the silverstar. the lens was nice and red. i would be perfectly happy with them. what i was noticing was the voltage measured interior of the car would drop about 1.5 volts when hitting the brakes, turn signals, etc. i so i wanted something with less current since the headlights will probably be the pig. my ignition box runs off it's own power source so i really wasn't concerned about that.

the white LED produced an orange look (pictures don't show it well at all) and wasn't quite as bright. i hated the way it looked. the difference was slight between the 45 red led and the silverstar.

a red 18 LED unit would have been much better for color. I made a mistake when ordering. the website claims the 45 version is the highest output. I'm sure it is, but not positive it would be that much of a difference. the nice thing now is that my volt gauge doesn't move when i hit the brake lights.

i can't physically tell there is an LED bulb inside except when the lights are turning on/off. the LEDs are on/off whereas the bulb has a slower response time.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
"buckeyedemon" said:
i don't recall where i said a red 18 LED bulb would have been the best (as compared to the red 45).

After looking at your post again, you didn't. For some reason I thought you meant the 18 LED bulb might have been the best for color overall, but re-reading it's clear you meant vs the white LEDs.

"buckeyedemon" said:
I did paint the buckets white (i think gloss?), have new lenses and a new tail light harness, so maybe all those things add up to nice lighting.

I would have to agree with that, absolutely. I am coming from the opposite end of the spectrum - old wiring, old lenses and old, faded housings.

Mainly I am concerned with having the brakes stand out better during full daylight.

I took a few pics yesterday to refer back to.

Off:
IMG_9352.JPG


Brakes on, original condition:
IMG_9340.JPG


Brakes on, buckets painted white inside, grounds quickly gone over with a wire brush:
IMG_9344.JPG



So you can see some improvement already. I plan on going over the grounds again more thoroughly, and hopefully the new lenses will help a bit as well. I will probably grab some 1157-R45-T's for good measure.
 
Doug: I had much the same situation with my /66. I found that after I fitted some tin/aluminum foil (shiny side out) with a little silicone, behind the bulb, there was a great improvement (I wanted to keep the 1157's) and cheap too. Just FYI. Mark
 
Well I just placed an order for the non-sequential 230 LED taillights with Mustang Project. If some idjit crashes into me it won't be because my brake/turn signal lights were too hard to see.

"jmlay" said:
When painting the housing use a gloss paint as the flat or satin will not reflect as well.

That would seem to be common sense, but I've also seen claims that flat white would be best. I split the difference & used semi-gloss... I had some on hand, and it worked well with the gauge housings when I put LEDs in there.
 
Beautiful and important to this thread.
A friend of mine solved the problem in his '68 fastback, covering the shells of taillights with 3M reflective paper, resistant to temperatures 100
 
Back
Top