Dne'
Well-Known Member
1) I keep looking at the angle of my UCA's and they just look too level. Is this correct regarding the level of the UCA?
Hx: new stock Uca's/LCA's, shelby drop, roller perches, stock springs cut 3/4 of the coil to achieve desired height.
Another concern I have about the front suspension:
2) The toe in/out. I haven't put a tape measure to the front wheels yet, but it looks as if my front wheels are toed out quite a bit, and the adjustment on the flaming river rack/tie rod only has 1/2" remaining on the threads! I called FR about this concern(with no facts to back up what I see may be incorrect), he said it should come in within specs.
However, 3)I have this worry that maybe the '71 spindles may be a problem. Right now the wheels are at their maximum positive camber>( I read somewhere it's easier to go from (+) to (-) vs. the other way when adjusting camber. Would there be a difference between '67 and '71 spindles?
Hx: new stock Uca's/LCA's, shelby drop, roller perches, stock springs cut 3/4 of the coil to achieve desired height.
Another concern I have about the front suspension:
2) The toe in/out. I haven't put a tape measure to the front wheels yet, but it looks as if my front wheels are toed out quite a bit, and the adjustment on the flaming river rack/tie rod only has 1/2" remaining on the threads! I called FR about this concern(with no facts to back up what I see may be incorrect), he said it should come in within specs.
However, 3)I have this worry that maybe the '71 spindles may be a problem. Right now the wheels are at their maximum positive camber>( I read somewhere it's easier to go from (+) to (-) vs. the other way when adjusting camber. Would there be a difference between '67 and '71 spindles?
![IMG_8581.jpg](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v417/Denee/IMG_8581.jpg)
![IMG_8583.jpg](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v417/Denee/IMG_8583.jpg)