• Hello there guest and Welcome to The #1 Classic Mustang forum!
    To gain full access you must Register. Registration is free and it takes only a few moments to complete.
    Already a member? Login here then!

351 based stroker owners, please advise.

Sluggo

Sluggo

Active Member
Alrighty then....

I'm going to have to refresh my stroker at the very least.
Here's what I know I'm going to do for sure.

Re-ring and bearings if conditions permit.
Another new cam (obviously)
New dizzy gear
Rebalance rotating assembly with new flywheel and balancer.

How is your 351 based stroker set up and what do you like/dislike about it.
What would you do different?
 
Something I touched on in the other thread....I'd go through the oiling system, optimizing flow and balance. I don't have a stroked W, rather a stock stroke W, but it was built to run 7500rpm at HP levels similar to the strokers, so I had some of the same concerns. I spent a lot of time on lubrication management. In addition to the restrictors and that cute distro gear oiler, I built a windage tray from a sectioned Boss 302 tray, along with a few other tricks, and went to a rear sump oil pan.

If you're not running a SVO/FMS SFI damper, now might be a good time to switch, if you're having everything balanced. This is the one I use, PN# M-6316-C351:

fms-m-6316-c351.jpg


Good luck with the refresh...
 
Currently all the rotating assembly is balanced with 50oz balancer and flywheel.

I'll need to go back with the same imbalance, correct?
 
If purchasing a new damper, be sure to purchase one applicable to the 50 oz imbalance application. Mine is 28 oz so that part number may not be appropriate. Measure twice, cut once LOL...

The balance shop can advise you specifically...
 
I'd recommend getting a new oil pump as well, just for insurance :)

Definitely need a 50oz balancer. Fluidampr is a pretty good brand.
 
"buening" said:
Definitely need a 50oz balancer. Fluidampr is a pretty good brand.
Click to expand...

:scar What? All 351Ws are 28oz and stroker cranks seem to always end up at 28oz anyway, unless you spend a blue fortune on Mallory metal.
 
That's what they are balance at for stock, but doesn't mean it can't be a 50oz. Sluggo definitely make sure it is a 50oz balance.
 
If the OP had the original engine dynamically balanced, the balance sheet/pick list will notate the parts used. The part numbers for the flexplate and damper differ between 28 and 50 oz imbalances.

In my case, as the crank was OEM and reciprocating weight fell due to parts changes, the 28oz imbalance was appropriate and, even then, there was substantial weight removal on the counterweights, flexplate, and damper. IDK the parameters for stroker engines; perhaps 50 oz is more appropriate. The parts list won't lie LOL...
 
When the engine was originally built it was balanced with 50oz parts. There had to be a reason. that's what I'll go back with.

No choice on the oil pump. It's cratered.
 
"Sluggo" said:
When the engine was originally built it was balanced with 50oz parts. There had to be a reason. that's what I'll go back with.

No choice on the oil pump. It's cratered.
Click to expand...

Where did you or someone get a 50 oz. 351w crank? That would REALLY limit your choices and make things much more expensive. As pointed out before, ALL 351w engines where 28 oz. imbalance.

To answer your original question, my 408 stroker (28 oz. imbalance) is an '85 block (roller ready) and is built with a Probe crank, Probe forged pistons, and Probe forged rods. It has AFR 185 heads. It has a Ford Racing F303 cam, with 1.7 ratio Crane Gold rockers. Topped off with a Weiand Stealth intake and a Holley 750 DP. Ignition is all MSD. It has 10.18:1 compression with the 58cc heads.

It dynoed at 354 hp at the rear wheels and has 416 ft. lbs. of torque (I've done several things since then that should have upped both numbers). It idles at about 900 RPM, and has 3,000 ft. lbs. of torque by 1500 RPM. The car is a beast. What would I do differently? Not a thing. It's got WAY more power than I need, and it is extremely easy easy to drive.
 
"Fast68back" said:
I still don't see 3k, 300 maybe...
Click to expand...

OOPS! I'm an idiot.

:weas Yeah, 3,000 ft. lbs. of torque would be ridiculous. You are correct ... 300 ft. lbs. by about 1700 RPM! ROFLMAO!!!
 
Glad you finally saw it John... With the exception of Mark I'm always worried my odd sense of humor just pisses people off...... It does however explain my lack of friends..
 
"johnpro" said:
Where did you or someone get a 50 oz. 351w crank? That would REALLY limit your choices and make things much more expensive. As pointed out before, ALL 351w engines where 28 oz. imbalance.
Click to expand...

Gonna have to pull the shrug card here. Engine was built by PAW over there in your neck of the woods.

For some reason they decided 50oz was the way to go. Using 5.0 parts on it.
 
Its a pretty old build, no? I thought you told me it had sat for a while before you got it. Maybe it was one of the early stroker kits.
 
Yes. Was built in 99/00 and went up on blocks shortly after. Got it back on the road in 08.
 
From an article in mustangs and fords august 2000.

PAW begins its quest for cubic inches with a 351W block bored and honed .060-inch oversize. The cylinder skirts are notched to clear the Chrysler 360ci small-block connecting rods. The 351W gets stroked a half-inch by fitting the block with a 400M crankshaft (the 400M is a tall-deck Cleveland). Keep in mind the 351W has a 3.50-inch stroke while the 400M has 4 inches of stroke. PAW takes a 400M crankshaft and removes the ridge not present in a 351W crankshaft. This gets the timing set to line up properly between the 351W block and 400M crank. The 400M crank is also machined to accept a longer Woodruff key, which keeps the harmonic balancer where it belongs. To marry the Chrysler 360 rods to the 400M crank, PAW machines the rod journals down from 2.311 inches to 2.124 inches. But there's more: PAW offset grinds the journals .125-inch to add even more stroke for a whopping 4.125 inches.

Traditional 400M engines used a 28-ounce offset-balance harmonic balancer. Because we're changing the dynamics of the engine's rotating and reciprocating weight, PAW uses the late-model 50-ounce offset balancer to counterbalance the additional reciprocating weight.
Click to expand...
 
"Sluggo" said:
From an article in mustangs and fords august 2000.
Click to expand...

Ok. That makes a lot more sense. Are you going to stay with the 400M crank, or go with a modern, stroker one? Personally, I'd pony up the money for a modern SCAT or Probe crank/rods/pistons. In fact, if that's how your engine was built, I, personllay, would pony up $250 for a core charge and start with an '85/later, roller ready block.

The PAW way of doing it was cool technology way back then. There's just SOOOO many better ways to do it, these days.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top