AtlantaSteve
Active Member
"Horseplay" said:A clearer picture can be painted by asking how many of your peers died, etc. at a young age because they didn't...fill in the blank.
Actually even that's not true. There are several ways to view the statistics, deaths per hundred million miles traveled, deaths per 100,000 people, etc etc. etc.
With the increase in safety, there's an overall picture painted that things must have been HORRIBLE way back before. That's not the case. People walked away from bad wrecks back then, too. And it's not like it was bumpercars, with people wrecking left and right. You might have 1 serious accident in your lifetime. The question is, in those serious accidents, how much more likely are you to avoid serious accident and injury.
Sheldon mentioned his mom's olds with 2 point seatbelts. That's what my mom drove too! Olds Station wagon with 2 point seatbelts in the back. Hey I lived just fine. Oh, also, my mom's car was never in a serious accident...so, for all intents and purposes, the seatbelts were irrelevant. It coulda had old ropes tied to the seat springs, for all they mattered.
Per capita serious accidents are very very rare. And even old cars it wasn't like any serious accident and you were going to die, no question...But I simply reject the notion that when that serious accident *DOES* happen, that a modern car is not a safer place to be. A safer place to put your kids. And I think it's got more to do with overall safety design, than JUST pinning it on "Seatbelts and airbags"