• Hello there guest and Welcome to The #1 Classic Mustang forum!
    To gain full access you must Register. Registration is free and it takes only a few moments to complete.
    Already a member? Login here then!

Little changes make a big difference...

2ndgen

Member
or how I learned to love my vacuum gauge!

Progress continues on my Mach restoration, but I have to admit I was pretty let down by the initial startup of the engine. Frankly it idled like crap and made my eyes sting from unburnt hydrocarbons... I was worrying that I had over cammed my stroker and that my car was not going to be much fun in city traffic.

This is my first stroker build (a 6.2 rod 393w) and although I did a lot of research it is fair to say I was pretty nervous... particularly about that cam. It is a hydraulic roller just under 240 degrees duration at 0.050; by far the largest I have used. All the articles and posts I read said that the extra cubic inches would tame this cam - not to a stock idle but still within the "streetable" limits with a lopey idle. The problem was I could not make it idle worth a damn!

First I checked cranking pressure... and found I was between 185 and 190 on all cylinders - just where I wanted it. My compression ratio is just a bit over 10:1; once again just where I wanted it. And yet the plugs were black and wet with gas...

I had checked TDC with a piston stop and had the initial timing set to 12 degrees with a total mechanical advance of 36 degrees. I am running a vacuum advance too.

But the car just would not idle below 1000 RPM and the idle mix adjustment screws seemed to have no effect. I could close them all the way down - obviously I idling on the main circuit, not the idle circuit...

Back to the internet and a ton more research... was I going to have to swap cams???

First problem - how to get on the idle circuit... Verified with a mirror that the throttle blades were cracked open. Notice that the throttle return spring has barely any tension... hmm. Shortened the throttle return spring and watched the throttle action... hmm... throttle still not closing all the way.

Second problem - unhook the throttle cable and notice the linkage closes firmly and fully. Inspect the throttle cable set up (new) and find slight binding on firewall insulation pad (new). Enlarge the opening on the firewall pad - better but not perfect. Finally figure out that the throttle cable is just about 1/8th inch too short. Adjust and now the linkage and pedal operate correctly and the throttle closes fully when released.

Third problem - now that the throttle closes fully, I am on the idle circuits and the mixture screws begin to work. Adjust the idle mixture screws and my eyes no longer burn... (have not checked the plugs yet; will do after I get some miles on the car. It is currently registered non-operational).

Fourth problem - engine idles very rough/choppy at 900 RPM... Internet research revealed an article on setting initial timing using a vacuum gauge... Using this method I find that I can pick up 4 inches of vacuum (went from 10 to 14) by advancing the initial timing to 18 degrees. Recurved the mechanical advance to a total of 34 degrees all in by 3000 RPM. Engine now idles much better! I can drop the idle down to 700 in gear with my foot on the brakes and get a nice lope. The engine runs slightly cooler too. The basic message was every engine is different, the stock timing is for stock components and merely a starting point, the vacuum gauge measures the true efficiency of your individual engine.

Fifth problem - and sure to cause a controversy. In my research I found an article written by the engineers at GM who invented vacuum advance... They were quite vocal about the ported vs. manifold controversy. They claimed ported/timed vacuum was an abomination created by the smog/emissions restrictions and was solely used to retard timing to increase exhaust gas temperatures - thereby reducing emissions. The stated quite clearly that any performance engine should use manifold vacuum. So I jumped ship and went for it... now at idle my engine pulls close to 30 degrees of timing and loves it. The throttle response is great too...

So after a bunch of research and a couple hours tinkering my engine is dramatically different/better. All my cam concerns are gone! Hope this helps someone else...

Good luck,
-Rory
 
Re: Little changes make a big differrence...

No real controvery about the vac advance - IMO, they are right. There is little difference in ported vs manifold vac under most driving conditions - so no real difference in total advance when off idle. At idle is where the biggest effect is seen. It improves idle quite a bit, but drives emissions much higher.
 
Everyone loves to think that ported vacuum is best, and how the cars came from the factory, but it's simply not true. Most of the early cars came from the factory with full manifold vacuum.

Of course, in a performance application, all vacuum advance is worthless *LOL*.
 
"johnpro" said:
Of course, in a performance application, all vacuum advance is worthless *LOL*.

I was gonna ask who is running vacuum advance on their car. I think it's safe to assume John's not. Nor am I.
 
"Sluggo" said:
I was gonna ask who is running vacuum advance on their car. I think it's safe to assume John's not. Nor am I.
Obviously I am...

But back to you: why wouldn't you run vacuum advance on any street driven car? I can understand why you wouldn't for an all out race car; but if it is mainly for the street I can see real benefits (better idle, cooler engine temp at idle, better fuel economy) and no draw backs.

Once you punch it with a properly adjusted vacuum can (not just proper advance but proper vacuum activation range) it drops out of the equation - just like fuel economy!

Curious,
-Rory
 
Now you got me thinking....lol. I remembered that I have an old vacuum gauge from when I used to ride the motorcycles and used it to set the multiple carbs on them. I am going to get it out and see what I get. Thanks for the info on this... Gary.
 
I believe in both manifold vacuum for vacuum advance, and vacuum advance itself. I'm using it on my car. If it does nothing but make it idle smoother, it's worth it.
 
Both my cars idle great with it plugged off. If I use it on either car and on the 66 I sold when I get to the higher rpm range 4200-5000 range when I hold a shift I get terrible missing and well, just crappy performance!

I have used a vacuum gauge and set everything to the highest level. I set the timing from anywhere around 10-14 degrees. I just can not seem to make it run well with vacuum advance. On the flip side, I plugged the vacuum off on the 66 I sold and all of a sudden I have no problem all the way to 5500 rpm. I thought, that this was a very stock 2V C4 car. I'll try my 67 not stock 4V T5 car....Well guess what, the problem went away! When I took the C4 out of the 65 I started to have the same problem. I don't know if I had the problem with the C4 since I never really took it past 4k. So when I put the TKO in the 65 I took it up to 4200 and bam a problem. I plugged off the vacuum and wouldn't you know it the problem is gone!

So my permanent fix is to get rid of the vacuum advance and get the mechanical advance. I then can set the advance the way I want it. Oh, and by the way, I was running a stock dizzy on the 66 with points, Accel dizzy and points in the 67 and a Mallory dual point with one set of points on the 65.

Mel
 
"guruatbol" said:
Both my cars idle great with it plugged off. If I use it on either car and on the 66 I sold when I get to the higher rpm range 4200-5000 range when I hold a shift I get terrible missing and well, just crappy performance!

I have used a vacuum gauge and set everything to the highest level. I set the timing from anywhere around 10-14 degrees. I just can not seem to make it run well with vacuum advance. On the flip side, I plugged the vacuum off on the 66 I sold and all of a sudden I have no problem all the way to 5500 rpm. I thought, that this was a very stock 2V C4 car. I'll try my 67 not stock 4V T5 car....Well guess what, the problem went away! When I took the C4 out of the 65 I started to have the same problem. I don't know if I had the problem with the C4 since I never really took it past 4k. So when I put the TKO in the 65 I took it up to 4200 and bam a problem. I plugged off the vacuum and wouldn't you know it the problem is gone!

So my permanent fix is to get rid of the vacuum advance and get the mechanical advance. I then can set the advance the way I want it. Oh, and by the way, I was running a stock dizzy on the 66 with points, Accel dizzy and points in the 67 and a Mallory dual point with one set of points on the 65.

Mel

I don't doubt your observations at all, but I will point out that you may be treating the symptom and not the cause...

Is it the right vacuum advance unit for your car? Is your car under carb'ed? Is the vacuum advance plate in your distributor worn? The point is that there are many aspects of the vacuum advance system that have to work together properly. Switching to pure mechanical certainly bypasses many possible causes...

Obviously I can not comment on your cars without a lot more information, so the following is a sweeping generalization... but at 4000+ RPM under acceleration I would not expect enough vacuum to matter, and I don't associate additional advance with missing... (pinging is a different matter)

-Rory
 
Rory, I was kind of dumb founded when I plugged it off on three 289s with three different dizzy units, one new and three different carbs, and two different intake manis....

So, I get I am treating a symptom, but with all these variables and the same issue with the same cure, I get confused.

When this issue happened first I was in the 66 coupe with 289 C4 stock 2V engine and on the way between Imperial County to San Diego, CA on I8. I was going up hill and got a huge miss under load at 2800 rpm. I thought something was super wrong so I pulled over and saw the vacuum line off the dizzy. I reinstalled it and had same issue only at 4000 rpm. I waited until I got home to look into it. It never dawned on me to look at the vacuum advance as I have run them on stock engines for years. I put the light on it, checked the dwell, the vacuum and everything was set. I put some gas in it and went to the hill, same spot I had problems before. I had the same issue except the vacuum line did not pop off.

I lived with this issue until a one of the Knott's shows. I can not remember who but someone told me to plug off the vacuum advance and see what happened. Wow, to my surprise it worked.

So, when I had the same issue with my 67 and new dizzy, same fix and wow, no issues. when I got the 65 I noticed the same issue on the way back from getting the new TKO in San Diego, so I pulled over and plugged it off and wow, no issue.

I am not saying this is the be all, end all fix, and I am not saying that there isn't something else going on....What ever the issue really is, it is in three cars with three different setups. I would like to find the issue, I just can't until I get back from tour in October.

Rest assured I will follow this thread and take notes in order to find the issues!

Mel
 
"2ndgen" said:
But back to you: why wouldn't you run vacuum advance on any street driven car? I can understand why you wouldn't for an all out :10race car; but if it is mainly for the street I can see real benefits (better idle, cooler engine temp at idle, better fuel economy) and no draw backs.

My 408 will run straight up at 180 degrees all day long, even on 115 degree Sacramento days (now the non air-conditioned black interior is another story *LOL*). The engine idles fine at 900 RPM's (not too lopey) and screams like a banjie. I just see absolutely no reason for the vacuum advance, except for fuel economy. I didn't build it for economy, and could care less about fuel economy. I only drive it on the weekends, and if nothing else, it's one less bit of clutter in the engine bay.

I have gotten 18 mpg, though, on the freeway, which isn't too shabby for a car with 354 RWHP and 3:89 gears. :10
 
"johnpro" said:
I just see absolutely no reason for the vacuum advance, except for fuel economy.

1) It will idle more smoothly. Unless you just like to feel and hear the lope, this is a good thing.
2) It will generate less heat while idling. Maybe your cooling system can handle it, but why force it to?
3) What ya got against better mileage? A penny saved is a penny earned.

These might not be big or important to you, but they're not "absolutely nothing". Vacuum advance is a win-win.
 
Back
Top