• Hello there guest and Welcome to The #1 Classic Mustang forum!
    To gain full access you must Register. Registration is free and it takes only a few moments to complete.
    Already a member? Login here then!

Valve problem(still!)

Hmmmmmm.....wonder when that head swap would have surfaced if the valve problem would not have surfaced. What happened to the heads you were supposed to have? Did you provide them? Any difference in the new heads he is doing? What other things might have been mixed up along the way. I would be cautious with that type mistake not being noticed long before run time.....
 
from the pic it's hard to tell but the gaps between the coils on the questionable spring with no rocker look "compressed" compared to the spring next to it? and is there a shim or something under the spring, kinda bronze colored?
IMG_8990.jpg
 
Re: I still can't explain it!

"Dne'" said:
Herb called me and told me the story~ in short these are the wrong heads~ he admits a mess-up.
Click to expand...

Like I said before ... time to find a new friend to help. This guy just sounds more and more like a bozo. How are they the "wrong heads"? Wrong heads for what? A Camaro? They are the correct heads for NON-rail rockers on a Ford Small Block.

You really need to run away from this guy!!!
 
I'm also trying to figure out why these are "the wrong heads"? I guess at the very least he is sticking around till things are made right. I just hope he can make things right.
 
It does look like the spring in question is heftier than the neighboring one. Can you check the gap between the coils and compare to another spring on a closed valve? If the gap is smaller, then it's probably binding.

What year car do you have? Perhaps by "wrong heads", Herb means that you should have the heads with the rail type rocker arms. You can use either type, though, as long as you have the correct rocker arms for the heads.

Frank
 
Am I seeing what I think I'm seeing?

Are those not early heads with late valves?

From Mustang Steve's website....
Early 289 heads had valves with short tips (about 1/16 to 1/8" above the keepers) that used non-rail type rocker arms. They had the shorter 289 style pushrods and rocker arms without the rails that capture the stem of the valve keeping the rocker arm from sliding off the side. The pushrods went through holes in the heads that fit up close to the pushrods, keeping the rocker from sliding off by holding the pushrod in line. Those type heads had adjustable, press-in studs. Later heads used rail type rockers. The hole in the heads that the pushrods (longer 302 pushrods) go through is round, the valve stems protrude about 1/4" above the keepers and they were non-adjustable.
Click to expand...
 
Isn't it best to check if the camshaft is synchronized with the crankshaft?

Maybe it is 360° wrong ?! my opinion.
 
"B67FSTB" said:
Isn't it best to check if the camshaft is synchronized with the crankshaft?

Maybe it is 360° wrong ?! my opinion.
Click to expand...
wouldn't 360 be okay? Maybe you meant 180? Anyway, it ran so it's probably not out of time. I think the coil bind or maybe valve height vs push rod length is more likely. It does seem there are some mis-matched parts...
 
4 stroke engine , 360° is one turn , every two turn you have a combustion in the same cylinder.So when your cam is NOT synchronized with the crank , the piston could smak an open valve. See broken rocker which is broken on the valve side.
I would recomment to turn over the engine for at least 10 times ,by hand or by starter , in little steps so oilpressure can built up.
Your engine builder did made a big mistake IMHO.
 
Those are the wrong retainers. They are compressing the valve springs too much and you are breaking rockers because you are running into coil bind. It's amazing that you haven't broken other rockers also. I would check the rest of them for cracks. Could be when those heads were assembled that valve spring was shimmed just a little more because of a variance in the depth of that valve seat grind.
If it was the rocker slots binding on the stud then the rocker would break between the pushrod and the rocker slot instead of between the rocker slot and the valve like yours did.
Your 289 heads guide the rocker by using the pushrod slot in the head. They are effectively guide plates. You should not need shoulder rockers, although if they don't hit the retainers they won't hurt anything, still it's not the right way to do it.
Those heads have adjustable valves instead of positive stop "stepped" studs. If someone is getting confused they may crank down the rocker nuts thinking they are positive stop studs and run the valves into the pistons.
If this guy is going to bring you a good set of heads I'd take them if I were you. Be forewarned about the expertise of whoever put together the heads you have now.....
 
"B67FSTB" said:
4 stroke engine , 360° is one turn ,
Click to expand...
that's what I'm saying. If you rotate the cam 360 it will be exactly in the same place... the cam turns 2 to 1 to the crank so 180 would be a problem, not 360.
 
I'm back!

hi all, I've been away for a few days. I also paid attention to what Sluggo wrote," early model heads with late valves" Whatever the reason, heads are being built~ at least that's what I've been told. I'm going to write Herb and see what the next heads are coming from. A point that even Herb stated, that other rockers weren't breaking! Definitely would have solved the case a little quicker if 6 or 7 rockers had broke! lol I'll report back on what the heads are coming from.
dne'


"whisperer" said:
Those are the wrong retainers. They are compressing the valve springs too much and you are breaking rockers because you are running into coil bind. It's amazing that you haven't broken other rockers also. I would check the rest of them for cracks. Could be when those heads were assembled that valve spring was shimmed just a little more because of a variance in the depth of that valve seat grind.
If it was the rocker slots binding on the stud then the rocker would break between the pushrod and the rocker slot instead of between the rocker slot and the valve like yours did.
Your 289 heads guide the rocker by using the pushrod slot in the head. They are effectively guide plates. You should not need shoulder rockers, although if they don't hit the retainers they won't hurt anything, still it's not the right way to do it.
Those heads have adjustable valves instead of positive stop "stepped" studs. If someone is getting confused they may crank down the rocker nuts thinking they are positive stop studs and run the valves into the pistons.
If this guy is going to bring you a good set of heads I'd take them if I were you. Be forewarned about the expertise of whoever put together the heads you have now.....
Click to expand...
 
This thread may help about the later valves and early heads: http://forums.vintage-mustang.com/vintage-mustang-forum/589150-non-rail-rocker-rail-type-valve.html

Short answer is depending on the date code of your head the long tips may indeed be correct with non-rail type rockers.

You definitely don't "have the wrong heads". A 289 head is a 289 head. There are differences like the 289 Hipo heads but even those heads wouldn't cause this issue. One good thing is you are hopefully getting a better/newer set of heads, but that doesn't really determine what the issue is. With permission of your builder, I would install another rocker on that valve and rotate the motor BY HAND and watch the valve spring. Also feel for resistance when you get close to max lift. You definitely have spring binding issues and its either too long of pushrods, wrong spring type, too thick of retainers, or a combination of those that may be unique to that valve (wrong spring at that valve). New heads will eliminate the valves and springs, but won't eliminate the possibility of too long of pushrods or a faulty camshaft that has too much lift at that particular valve. If the new heads result in that same rocker breaking, I'd look at the pushrods or put a dial indicator on the rocker and measure the lift to compare to another valve.

The rocker broke exactly how I would expect it to, the point of maximum stress near the fulcrum.
 
"buening" said:
With permission of your builder, I would install another rocker on that valve and rotate the motor BY HAND and watch the valve spring. Also feel for resistance when you get close to max lift. You definitely have spring binding issues and its either too long of pushrods, wrong spring type, too thick of retainers, or a combination of those that may be unique to that valve (wrong spring at that valve). New heads will eliminate the valves and springs, but won't eliminate the possibility of too long of pushrods or a faulty camshaft that has too much lift at that particular valve. If the new heads result in that same rocker breaking, I'd look at the pushrods or put a dial indicator on the rocker and measure the lift to compare to another valve.

The rocker broke exactly how I would expect it to, the point of maximum stress near the fulcrum.
Click to expand...

Gotta agree - I would rotate by hand, or have him do it to determine when the bind occurs, then why.
 
TMJ

I spoke with Herb a little bit ago, basically just had installed the wrong valves! The next set of heads are from a 289(doah!) with the correct valves! Pretty much sums it up! He like some of you may have been thinking~ why didn't more rocker arms break!? Just the one rocker breaking kind of threw off finding the correct diagnosis~! Now to fix my body so I can fix my stang!

I know this is off topic, but I have been having a horrible time for months with headaches, jaw pain, lower molar pain, ear pain, neck pain, dizziness, louder than usual tinnitus, and hyperacusis,etc. I Had an MRI of my brain, neck only to hear, can't find anything here! Then onto my dentist which examined my teeth, xrayed my TMJ's, "all looks ok" and sold me a night guard for 450! Just about ready to throw the towel in~ Today I got back from my ENT(ear nose throat), he said my TMJ's are screwed up probably causing everthing I listed~ so antibiotics, muscle relaxers and I requested a few Valium~ now I just need a good massage therapist! It's Hell being a human! lol
dne'
 
My wife was supposedly diagnosed with TMJ by the dentist. She was having headaches and everything pointed to TMJ. She was also stressed out with work and hated her job. She switched jobs, stress level went down, and all headaches and symptoms of TMJ went away. She hasn't been back but that would have been an expensive mistake to have the dentist do the night guard stuff. I am assuming we are talking about TMJ, which is a symptom.
 
Also, be VERY CAREFUL that Herb doesn't install the shorter valve stem ends and then run the rail type rockers. If he uses those same valve spring retainers then the lips on the rail rocker will basically push just the retainer down and the keepers will go flying, causing you to drop all valves into the piston. Not a good thing :amaz
 
I can think of better things to do!

OK, heads are off! It's not really all that bad to remove these heads other than the darned heads weigh so much(for me!)! I had to use my engine crane to remove the heads like I did last time. Plus not having the fenders on is wonderful to work on the engine! Herb will be here to help me, or me help him put it back together. I need to paint my next set of heads first, so probably be next week before I put it back together again. Actually I wouldn't mind the re-assembly if I could get my brother to set the heads on(the brute work), I could get it back together with no problem. The crane works well to get the heads off, but may not work as well setting the heads back on.


1)I do have a question about the head bolts~ One of the shorter head bolts is very hard to turn; can I use a tap to run in the block to clean up the threads, Or should I get new head bolts? can they be purchased?

2)I know the roller rocker arms don't put much extra HP, but they look really neat, are they a worthless investment?

You all wrote exceptional replies~I do appreciate ya'lls help/advice/opinions!!
dne'

IMG_8991.jpg
 
Always run a tap in the block where the head bolts will run.To clean up the threads so the stress on the head is equally spread over the entire head.
Lube the NEW bolts thoroughly or lay them in a boil of oil.
Check your new headgasket when putting it on the block.
It has an upside but also back/front side ,otherwise you encounter overheating problems.
( sorry for the bad english , trying to help)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top