JRANGER
Active Member
Havent had any issues with it. I like itLooking great, how did that all metal work out for you?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Hello there guest and Welcome to The #1 Classic Mustang forum!
To gain full access you must Register. Registration is free and it takes only a few moments to complete.
Already a member? Login here then!
Havent had any issues with it. I like itLooking great, how did that all metal work out for you?
Yes i am using evercoat lightweight to pack the FG as recommended by Rich from MTF. This is what he does to get a bigger bonding area. I bought some 3m 08115 bonding adhesive which is what rich uses as well.... Im not sure about it though. I feel like screw sunk in would be a little more permanent but i dunno lolNice, are you using the evercoat to pack the fiberglass pieces? What are you going to use for the adhesive? I plan to eventually get the side scoops.
Those are 1970 tail lights, not 1969. 1969 tail lights had equally spaced chrome highlights.Somewhat. These are 69 lights which are long then the 67 you usually see.
View attachment 30842 View attachment 30843 View attachment 30844
No sir...The shelby lights 67-68 cougars had what you're thinking of. Theb 69-70 used this style. They are wider then the 67-68Those are 1970 tail lights, not 1969. 1969 tail lights had equally spaced chrome highlights.
Ive decided to go with hard lines as i dont want to risk cracking to feather it in. I am feathering from the door gap to the door thoughAs for the edges of your scoop, it looks like the scoop is very close to your rear flare. You'd probably have to blend those two edges together when feathering since they're so close. I always thought the blended in scoop looks better for that style, the Shelby style scoop looks good with hard lines.
No sir...The shelby lights 67-68 cougars had what you're thinking of. Theb 69-70 used this style. They are wider then the 67-68